Discussion :: Critical Resoning
-
The number of instances where judges have made unwanted remarks in open courts against other constitutional/ statutory bodies or persons who were not before them is increasing. There is a need to bring such behaviour of judges within the purview of judicial standards.Which of the following can be inferred/concluded from the given information?
|
A.
There is a set of judicial standards which the judges are expected to follow.
|
|
B.
Till now no one has set any standards for judges.
|
|
C.
It is not desirable for the judges to pass such comments on other constitutional/ statutory bodies in their absence.
|
|
D.
Freedom of expression cannot be exercised while in official capacity.
|
|
E.
None of these
|
Whatsapp
Facebook
Answer : Option A
Explanation :
The passage states that the behaviour of the judges such as commenting on other constitutional/ statutory bodies or persons should be brought under judicial standards. This indicates that there are certain standards already existing. Hence, (A) can be inferred from the passage.
Choice (B) contradicts the information given in the passage.
Be The First To Comment