Discussion :: Statement and Argument
-
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.
Statement : Should the retirement age for academicians be raised to 65 years ?
Arguments :
I. No, this will be unfair to the non-academicians having lower age limit for retirement.
II. Yes, experienced academicians can greatly contribute to the nation's intellectual property.
|
A.
Only argument I is strong. |
|
B.
Only Argument II is strong. |
|
C.
Either I or II is strong. |
|
D.
Neither I nor II is strong. |
|
E.
Both I and II are strong. |
Whatsapp
Facebook
Answer : Option A
Explanation :
Only I follows. Because in India all people are equal. If the retirement age for academicians is increased, this will be unfair to non-academicians. As far experiences is concerned, then it is for all people in their fields. Therefore, in such circumstances why only for the academicians retirement age is increased.
Be The First To Comment