Discussion :: Analyzing Arguements
-
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. No search of a person's home or personal effects may be conducted without a written search warrant issued on probable cause. This means that a neutral judge must approve the factual basis justifying a search before it can be conducted.
This paragraph best supports the statement that the police cannot search a person's home or private papers unless they have
|
A.
legal authorization
|
|
B.
direct evidence of a crime.
|
|
C.
read the person his or her constitutional rights.
|
|
D.
a reasonable belief that a crime has occurred.
|
|
E.
requested that a judge be present.
|
Whatsapp
Facebook
Answer : Option A
Explanation :
The second and third sentence combine to give support to choice a. The statement stresses that there must be a judge's approval (i.e., legal authorization) before a search can be conducted. Choices b and d are wrong because it is not enough for the police to have direct evidence or a reasonable belief—a judge must authorize the search for it to be legal. Choices c and e are not mentioned in the passage.
Be The First To Comment